Drawing for THE LAST EMPEROR

USPTO serial 79072134

THE LAST EMPEROR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3832101Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 10, 2010
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LAST EMPEROR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roxana A. Sullivan

Roxana A. Sullivan Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC181 W Madison Street, Suite 4500Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Electronic circuits, optical disks, magnetic tapes, magnetic disks, magnetic cards, magneto-optical disks, CD-ROMs, ROM-cartridges and DVDs, all of which contain computer programs featuring video games for arcade video game machines; downloadable computer programs featuring video games for arcade video game machines; gaming machines adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; gaming machines with multi terminals adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; electronic circuits, optical disks, magnetic tapes, magnetic disks, magnetic cards, magneto-optical disks, CD-ROMs, ROM-cartridges and DVDs, all of which contain computer programs featuring video games for gaming machines; downloadable computer programs featuring video games for gaming machines; electronic circuits, optical disks, magnetic tapes, magnetic disks, magnetic cards, magneto-optical disks, CD-ROMs, ROM-cartridges and DVDs, all of which contain computer programs featuring video games for slot machines; downloadable computer programs for slot machines; apparatus for electronic games for home use adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; electronic circuits, optical disks, magnetic tapes, magnetic disks, magnetic cards, magneto-optical disks, CD-ROMs, ROM-cartridges and DVDs, all of which contain computer programs for video games for home use adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; downloadable computer programs featuring video games for home use adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; electronic circuits, optical disks, magnetic tapes, magnetic disks, magnetic cards, magneto optical disks, CD-ROMs, ROM cartridges and DVDs, all of which contain computer programs for hand held video games for use with liquid crystal displays; downloadable computer programs for hand-held video games for use with liquid crystal displays ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028[ Coin-operated arcade video game machines; magnetic card operated arcade video game machines; arcade video game machines with multi-terminals; cabinets for arcade video game machines; parts and fittings of arcade video game machines; arcade video game machines; ] slot machines; cabinets of slot machines; gaming machines other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; gaming machines with multi-terminals other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor [; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 12, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 10, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 15, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 11, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 16, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 10, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 20, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 7, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance