Drawing for AEGIR

USPTO serial 79072135

AEGIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3860841Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 12, 2010
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEGIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet G. Ricciuti

Janet G. Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC3735 Concord RoadDoylestown, PA 18902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for displaying images and processing data issued by weather radars; computer software used for forecasting rainSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Production of energy, namely, producing electrical, thermal, climatic, geothermal, solar, wind, hydraulic and renewable energySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Software design and development; software installation, updating and maintenance; rental of computer software; services of engineers; computer programming, especially with respect to the hydrodynamic calculation of free surface run-offSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 29, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 19, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 19, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 12, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 12, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 26, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance