Drawing for NAVAL SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79072138

NAVAL SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3864366Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 19, 2010
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAVAL SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Galbreath

John A. Galbreath Galbreath Law Offices, P.C.2516 Chestnut Woods Ct.Reisterstown, MD 21136UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 23, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 2, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 3, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 26, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 26, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 12, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 19, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 3, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance