Drawing for ACEO

USPTO serial 79072169

ACEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3818605Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2010
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ACEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products used in industry, science, photography, agriculture, horticulture and forestry; [ organic acids for industrial use; acetic acid ]ACTIVE—
042Chemical laboratory services; chemist services; engineering services; physicist services; industrial design services; research and development of new chemical and/or technical processes for others; [ technical writing for others, namely, preparation of technical documentation; ] analytical services in science and technology, namely, chemical, physical and engineering analysis for others; [ technical inspection of installations, machines and apparatus in the fields of chemistry, physics and engineering; ] providing technical advice in the field of process technology [ ; liaison services to facilitate the exchange of technical information, namely, providing information on the subject of scientific research and development; consultation in the field of chemistry, physics and engineering; providing technical advice in the fields of chemistry, physics and engineering to licensees ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 18, 2022NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
May 17, 202215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
May 17, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2021E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 27, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 15, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 15, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 17, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 19, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 2, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 19, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 10, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 10, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 10, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 3, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance