USPTO serial 79072269
SANTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3811124Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SANTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farzad A. Panjshiri
Farzad A. Panjshiri Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical switching equipment, namely, electric DC switches and switches for heavy current | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Santon Holland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ewac Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Ewac Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Santon Holland B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SANTON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |