USPTO serial 79072348
DECOFOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3853757Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DECOFOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
James C. Wray James C. Wray1493 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 300McLean, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal panels, namely, metal fence panels, metal wire panels, namely, metal wire fence panels, fences consisting of metal panels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |