Drawing for SOFT ARMOUR

USPTO serial 79072438

SOFT ARMOUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3778324Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 20, 2010
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFT ARMOUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

Milena S. Mishev Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP100 Matawan RoadSuite 120Matawan, NJ 07747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Ceramic materials in form of granules, namely, ceramic granules used in manufacturingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019[ Ceramic coating materials, namely, ceramic tiles for flooring and facing; non-metallic coating materials, namely, ] Ceramic in granule form, namely, sealer coatings sold as in integral part of non-metal tiles for construction; articles of ceramics for building purposes; non metallic prefabricated, portable and transportable buildings; non-metallic panels, namely, wall panelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 20, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 11, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 4, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 4, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 4, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
May 4, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 4, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 201671AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 17, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 21, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 31, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance