USPTO serial 79072546
QOOQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3922123Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2011
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QOOQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer keyboards; audio-video compact discs featuring instruction in the field of cooking; apparatus for entertainment designed to be used with a separate display screen or a monitor, namely, computer game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; video screens; telecommunication transmitters; audio and video receivers; data processing apparatus, namely, data processors; intercommunication apparatus, namely, computer touch screen; computer interfaces; optical readers; recorded computer software for use in database management and organization, use as a spreadsheet, word processing and use as a video player in the field of cooking; computer memories; computer programs for use in database management and organization, use as a spreadsheet, word processing and use as a video player in the field of cooking; computers; downloadable software for use in database management and organization, use as a spreadsheet, word processing and use as a video player in the field of cooking; recorded computer programs for use in database management and organization, use as a spreadsheet, word processing and use as a video player in the field of cooking; recorded computer operating programs; computer central processing units; sound reproduction apparatus; warning streamers; digital audio and video disc players; sound transmitting apparatus; computer mice; all the aforementioned goods in the field of culinary subject matter | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Electronic telecommunications display services, namely, video broadcasting; communications by computer terminals; providing access to databases; providing telecommunication channels for teleshopping services; computer aided transmission of messages and images; broadcasting of television programmes; all the aforementioned services in the field of culinary subject matter | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design, development and installation of computers software; computer programming; hosting of web sites, all the aforementioned services in the field of culinary subject matter | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |