USPTO serial 79072553
KOTT-GAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3876377Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOTT-GAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Flexible tubes and pipes of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Water supply equipment and sanitary installations, namely, water pumps as parts of sanitary installations in households or for industrial or commercial use; bath fittings, namely, drains, couplers, valves, spouts, traps, bibs and plumbing pipe nipples; showers and shower cubicles being shower enclosures; taps, mixer taps for water pipes, nozzles for water taps being pearling nozzles, namely, jet nozzles for bath tubs, irrigation spray nozzles, anti-splash tap nozzles; sanitary apparatus and installations, namely, shower heads, hand showers, overhead showers, mounts for hand showers, portable Turkish bath cabinets, namely, saunas; water-conducting fittings, namely, shower, bath tub, wash stand and wash basin fittings, namely, escutcheons, sink strainers, tub control valves | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Non-metal gaskets for use in plumbing; canvas hose pipes for use in plumbing; non-metal reinforcing materials for pipes, namely, filaments, threads and sheets; pipe gaskets, hoses of textile, namely, shower hoses; non-metal hoses, namely, shower hoses; valves of India rubber or vulcanised fibre; junctions, not of metal, for hoses, namely, hose couplings, hose nipples | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann GOSLA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann GOSLA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kottmann GOSLA GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named KOTT-GAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |