Drawing for DOOYA

USPTO serial 79072579

DOOYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3885514Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 7, 2010
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DOOYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Prakash NAMA

Convention Plaza, 1 Harbour Road3011, 30/F, Office TowerWanchai, 000000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mixing machines; disintegrators; filtering machines in the nature of air filters for mechanical purposes; electrically operated curtain drawing devices; shredders for industrial use; electrical shoe polishers; electrical gate-opener; automobile servicing equipment, namely, brake flushing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 9, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 18, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 28, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 27, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 24, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 7, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 19, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance