USPTO serial 79072811
AURORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4081730Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-20040 USMATE VELATE (MI), IT
I-20040 USMATE VELATE (MI), IT
I-20040 USMATE VELATE (MI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan
KATHLEEN A COSTIGAN HEDMAN & COSTIGAN PC1230 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 7TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Trolleys for shopping | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | All-purpose reusable carrying bags; handbags; suitcases; rucksacks; wallets; purses; school satchels; document satchels of leather and imitation leather; small bags for carrying babies' accessories, for umbrellas, trunks; animal hides; articles made from hide, namely, briefcases; leather; leather articles, namely, leather briefcases; imitation leather; articles made from imitation leather, namely, imitation leather key chains; sun umbrellas; parasols; umbrellas; canes; whips; saddlery articles, namely, harnesses, horn bags | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 4, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |