Drawing for CICOR TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 79072900

CICOR TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3847993Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 14, 2010
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CICOR TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael N. Spink

Michael N. Spink Brinks Gilson & Lione524 South Main Street, Suite 200Ann Arbor, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Printed circuits; printed circuit boards; microelectronic modulesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Subcontracting services for the manufacture of printed circuits and electronic modules for use in radio-frequency communication, telecommunication, automotive, transportation, industrial, medical, airspace and defense fieldsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 30, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 14, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 25, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 29, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance