Drawing for BYNATURE

USPTO serial 79072934

BYNATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3936709Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 29, 2011
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BYNATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Aromatic preparations of natural origin, other than essential oils, for food products and drinks; spices also containing flavoring or fragrant substances of natural origin; condiments, namely, saucesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising and marketing consulting in the field of designing, developing, and promoting perfumes and aromas; promotion of perfumes and aromas; conducting marketing studiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Educational services, namely, teaching and training in the field of aromas and perfumesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Research, design, and development services in relation to aromas and perfumesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 1, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 10, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 29, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 21, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance