USPTO serial 79073012
COLUMBUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3896533Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2010
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLUMBUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Boutell
David G. Boutell FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mechanical spraying, rinsing and cleaning apparatus, machines and installations, namely, ride-on cleaning apparatus and machines, brushing vacuum machines, sweeping machines, and single disc machines, all for cleaning floors, pavement, hard surfaces and textiles; wet and dry vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaners; vacuum and water vacuum cleaners for industrial purposes; carpet brush vacuum cleaners; brushing machines and spray extraction machines for cleaning floors, pavement, hard surfaces and textiles; moving pavement cleaning apparatus and machines; escalator cleaning apparatus and machines; cleaning machines for hard surfaces and textile coverings; mechanical floor polishing apparatus; floor polishing machines; explosion-proof cleaning apparatus and machines, in particular compressed air cleaning machines for floors, pavement, hard surfaces and textiles, compressed air vacuum cleaners, compressed air fans; parts for mechanical spraying, rinsing and cleaning apparatus, machines and installations, namely, brushes, hoses, suction heads, spray nozzles, nozzle pipes, suction lips, filters and bags for vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner hoses, vacuum cleaner brushes, vacuum cleaner rods and vacuum cleaner nozzles, cleaning pads; mechanical carpet sweepers, namely, vacuum cleaners | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |