USPTO serial 79073148
LL LUXUSLASHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3892647Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2010
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LL LUXUSLASHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-3011 Neu-Purkersdorf, AT
A-3011 Neu-Purkersdorf, AT
A-3011 Neu-Purkersdorf, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacob Laufer, Esq.
1660 60th StreetBrooklyn, NY 11204UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Henryk Foltynek
- Other trademarks owned by Henryk Foltynek
- Other trademarks owned by Henryk Foltynek
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named LL LUXUSLASHES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |