USPTO serial 79073204
CRISALIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3933744Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2011
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CRISALIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
Molly Buck Richard RICHARD LAW GROUP5910 N. Central Expressway, Suite 325DALLAS, TX 75206United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, integrated medical examination systems comprising medical devices for plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery and computer software for information management for use in web-based physical examination and assessment of patients in a remote, clinical setting; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, integrated medical examination systems comprising medical devices for use in plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery and computer software for information management for use in web-based physical examination and assessment of patients in a remote, clinical setting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, computer programming in the medical field; scientific and technological research in the field of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery and design relating thereto, namely, medical and scientific research in the field of medical imaging; industrial analysis and research services in the field of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Cosmetic surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRISALIX SA
- Other trademarks owned by Crisalix Sàrl
- Other trademarks owned by Crisalix Sàrl
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CRISALIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |