Drawing for Serial No. 79073241

USPTO serial 79073241

Serial No. 79073241

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3906887Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2011
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79073241?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Griem, Jr.

John M. Griem, Jr. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP1 Chase Manhattan PlazaNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Leasing of real estateSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 1, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 9, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 18, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 18, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 2, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance