Drawing for OF (OVERFLAWLESS)

USPTO serial 79073376

OF (OVERFLAWLESS)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3872951Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 9, 2010
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OF (OVERFLAWLESS)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious stonesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of materials, namely, treatment of gemstones by laser beamSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Education and training services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of gemologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, research and development in the field of gemology; industrial analysis and research services in the field of gemology; design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 6, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 16, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 22, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 16, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 16, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 18, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance