USPTO serial 79073386
HAMATECH APE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4137341Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2012
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAMATECH APE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the semiconductor industry, namely, machines for varnishing and coating of substrates and discs, machines for curing coatings and varnishes, machines for cleaning of substrates, discs and masks for the production of semiconductors, machines for the inspection of substrates and discs, machines for developing exposed substrates, machines for etching layers on substrates, machines for handling and automation components and systems, consisting in substance of grippers, transport devices, conveyor devices, loading and unloading devices, linear and pivoting devices sold as an integral unit; machines for the semiconductor industry, namely, supply and treatment machines for supplying and treating liquids and gases, consisting in substance of pumps, filters as parts of machines, valves as parts of machines sold as an integral unit; metering machines for metering liquids and gases in the semiconductor industry; structural and replacement parts of the above mentioned goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific devices and instruments for use in laboratory applications, for treating and inspecting substrates in the semiconductor industry; electrical devices and instruments for high-power current technology, namely, apparatus and instruments for conveying, distributing, transforming, storing, regulating or controlling high-power electric current; electrical devices and instruments for low-power current technology, namely, apparatus and instruments for communicating, regulating or controlling low-power electric current; photographic, optical, weighing, measuring and controlling devices and instruments, all for scientific use and not for medical use, namely, photographic cameras, graduated rulers, automatic pressure control machines and instruments, temperature meters, pyrometers, pressure gauges, frequency meters, light meters for detecting light, viscosimeters, flowmeters, densitometers for measuring optical density of coatings, scales, ultrasonic and optical thickness gauges, dosimeters, detectors for inspecting and monitoring substrates and processes in the semiconductor industry, speed indicators; measuring, regulating and temperature controlling devices and instruments as part of supply and treatment systems for liquids and gases, all for scientific use and not for medical use, namely, control valves for regulating the flow of gases and liquids, temperature meters, pyrometers, pressure gauges, frequency meters, light meters for detecting light, viscosimeters, flowmeters, densitometers for measuring optical density of coatings, scales, ultrasonic and optical thickness gauges, dosimeters, detectors for inspecting and monitoring substrates and processes in the semiconductor industry, speed indicators; data carriers provided with programs, namely, prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring programs for semiconductor manufacturing machines; data processing equipment; structural and replacements parts of the above mentioned goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Processing of materials, namely, preparing photolithography and nanoimprint masks for the production of semiconductors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultancy services in the planning of buildings and infrastructure systems for production facilities for the semiconductor industry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HamaTech APE GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by HamaTech APE GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Suss MicroTec Photomask Equipment GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SÜSS MicroTec SE
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HAMATECH APE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 18, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 8, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |