Drawing for BRIDGE

USPTO serial 79073414

BRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marie-Anne Mastrovito

MARIE-ANNE MASTROVITO ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical hearing aids and their partsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 16, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 22, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 22, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 23, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 25, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance