USPTO serial 79073489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Casey
Timothy D. Casey Baker & Hostetler LLP999 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98104-4040UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radiological apparatus for industrial purposes, namely, optical inspection apparatus for industrial use; [ electronic imaging platforms in the field of inspection of semiconductor materials, namely, semiconductor wafers and reticles; thermal imaging systems, not for medical use; ] X-rays producing apparatus and installations, not for medical purposes, namely, industrial X-ray apparatus in the nature of testing equipment for determining industrial flaws; X-ray photographs, other than for medical purposes; [ X-rays tubes not for medical purposes; radiology screens for industrial purposes, namely, radiation shields for electronic products; protection devices against X-rays, not for medical purposes, namely, radiation shields for electronic products, clothing for protection against irradiation, face-protection shields, and eye covers for protective purposes; alarms, namely, access control and alarm monitoring systems; ] [ electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; particle accelerators; ] [ betatrons; cyclotrons; ] [ metal detectors for industrial or military purposes; detectors, namely, carbon dioxide detectors, fire and smoke detectors, ] radiation detectors; [ material testing instruments and machines namely, electronic apparatus for testing compression, strength, hardness and tensile characteristics of industrial materials; gas testing instruments; sounding apparatus and machines, namely, echo sounding devices; dosimeters; ] [ data processors; computer software for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet and for word processing; ] computer operating programs, recorded [ ; computer peripheral devices; ] [ blank integrated circuit cards; cosmographic instruments, namely, telescopes; atomic ray instruments, namely, industrial atomic ray apparatus in the nature of testing equipment for determining industrial flaws ; nucleon instruments, namely, instruments for testing nuclear material or producing photoneutron ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 25, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |