Drawing for GUILTY

USPTO serial 79073559

GUILTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUILTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery, non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, moisturizers, texturizers and toners; bath gel, shower gel, foam bath and personal deodorantsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 12, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 3, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 13, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 10, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance