Drawing for CROOZER

USPTO serial 79073565

CROOZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROOZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012trailers for bicycles for carrying loads or children, namely non self-propelled trailers and parts therefor, namely frames, handlebars, brakes, axles, spoked wheelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 3, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 19, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 1, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 1, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance