Drawing for DEFECTOMINI

USPTO serial 79073722

DEFECTOMINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3853807Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2010
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEFECTOMINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary M. Nath

Gary M. Nath The Nath Law Group112 S West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic apparatus, for the non-medical, nondestructive testing of industrial materials, namely, testing for material defects and material irregularities; Apparatus for testing semi-finished goods and wires for material defects, surface defects and material irregularities, namely, electronic apparatus for inspecting electrically conductive materials such as metal industrial goods and wires; Electronic apparatus for measuring electric, magnetic and other physical properties of electrically conductive materials; Electronic apparatus for measuring layer thickness, film thickness and other dimensions of electrically conductive materials; Probes, sensors, test heads and exploring coils for the aforesaid apparatus; Electronic data processing equipment for controlling electronic apparatus, and for evaluating information therefrom; Replacement parts of the aforesaid goods; Computer programs recorded on data carriers for controlling aforesaid electronic apparatus and for evaluating information obtained therefromSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 6, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 3, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 19, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 5, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 5, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance