USPTO serial 79074011
MARINOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4097562Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2012
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARINOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Nahnsen
Mark J. Nahnsen Barnes & Thornburg LLPP.O. Box 2786Chicago, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils and fats, also in powdered form; fats for preparation of edible oils and fats; meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; broth and broth preparations, soups and soup preparations; food supplements, not for medical use, not included in other classes, namely, nutritional oils for food purposes, dairy-based food beverages, proteins for use as a food additive | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, pasta, processed cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, candy, sugar free candy, chocolate and candy bars; ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices, ice; food supplements, not for medical use, not included in other classes, namely, food flavorings, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, colas, carbonated beverages, lemonade, ginger beer, ginger ale, soda water, non-alcoholic cocktails; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, concentrates and mixes for fruit drinks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stepan Specialty Products LLC, a Delawar
- Other trademarks owned by Lipid Nutrition B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Lipid Nutrition B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Lipid Nutrition B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MARINOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |