Drawing for PRIMADONNA COLLECTION

USPTO serial 79074178

PRIMADONNA COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4024548Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 2011
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PRIMADONNA COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025ShoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 14, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 1, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 31, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 27, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 13, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 28, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2011NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 11, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 11, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance