Drawing for NXT

USPTO serial 79074277

NXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3964407Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2011
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina L. Martini

Christina L. Martini MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP444 West Lake Street, Suite 4000Chicago, IL 60606-0029United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Semi-conductor lithographic machines, namely, lithographic machines used to manufacture semiconductorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 2, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 2, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 2, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 24, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 16, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 23, 2011LNNXLIMITATION HAS NO EFFECT PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance