Drawing for INTELLIVENT

USPTO serial 79074324

INTELLIVENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIVENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Fans and ventilation apparatus for bathroom (domestic) useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 12, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 22, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 25, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 24, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance