USPTO serial 79074331
ASW:
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASW:?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Business software systems (business software) intended for managing all company resources, especially business software designed for managing finance and accounting resources; business software for controlling finished goods and products; business software for controlling materials; business software for controlling human resources; business software designed for recording business dealings concluded and controlling their realisation; business software for controlling production; business software designed for administration and configuration; business software designed for managing retail sales establishments; business software designed for managing online and paying for parking by SMS; business software designed for managing systems for settlement for and payment of goods and services (invoicing systems), especially business software designed for managing systems for settlement for and payment of goods and services in the field of telecommunications (fixed and mobile telephony), electricity, water, gas, Internet and telephone services; business software designed for decision-making support | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Managing development projects for business software; adapting business software to the needs and requirements of users; consultancy services in the field of business software; consulting and maintenance of business software; all above-mentioned services for business software intended for managing all company resources, especially business software designed for managing finance and accounting resources, for controlling finished goods and products, for controlling materials, for controlling human resources, for recording business dealings concluded and controlling their realisation, for controlling production facilities, for administration and configuration, for managing retail sales establishments, for managing online and for payment of parking by SMS, for managing systems for settlement for and payment of goods and services (invoicing systems) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |