USPTO serial 79074507
DRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2011
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
University Court of the University of Aberdeen
Kings College Aberdeen, GB
Other trademarks owned by University Court of the University of Aberdeen
University Court; of the University of Aberdeen
Kings College; Aberdeen, GB
Other trademarks owned by University Court; of the University of Aberdeen
University Court; of the University of Aberdeen
Kings College; Aberdeen, GB
Other trademarks owned by University Court; of the University of Aberdeen
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Industrial chemicals for treating contaminated water and soil; draff for chemically removing pollutants from contaminated water and soil as a result of its chemical absorption properties and by mineralizing organic molecules and rendering them into carbon dioxide and water | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of contaminated water and soil; consultancy and advisory services in the field of treatment of contaminated water and soil | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University Court of the University of Aberdeen
- Other trademarks owned by University Court; of the University of Aberdeen
- Other trademarks owned by University Court; of the University of Aberdeen
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named DRAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |