USPTO serial 79074508
TORQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4235670Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2012
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TORQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Telford, Shropshire TF7 4QN, GB
Telford, Shropshire TF7 4QN, GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Tires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |