USPTO serial 79074575
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Altena, DE
Altena, DE
Altena, DE
Lennestadt, DD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN MYERS
JONATHAN MYERS LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21st FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | [ Semi-finished goods made of plastics, namely, plastic fibers and lace profiles made of plastics for restringing chairs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Shopping bags, namely, [ textile shopping bags, ] mesh shopping bags, and reusable shopping bags [ ; shopping bags made of plastic fibers with wheels attached ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Breadbaskets for domestic use, unfilled picnic baskets, containers made of plastic fibers for packing, packaging, [ for commercial use, ] namely, [ for storing and dispensing bulk foods, ] containers made of plastics, namely, bottles sold empty; bottle baskets; garden baskets; laundry baskets; containers made of plastics, namely, chest hampers; baskets for storing pencils and flowers, cutlery baskets; pet baskets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Dishes, bowls, containers made of plastics for household or kitchen use, pots, flower pots made of plastic, included in this class | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Table mats made of plastic included in this class | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | [ Carpets, door mats made of plastic ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 19, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 25, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |