USPTO serial 79074704
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BIEN SERAMIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Çankaya; Ankara, TR
Other trademarks owned by BIEN SERAMIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
BIEN SERAMIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Çankaya; Ankara, TR
Other trademarks owned by BIEN SERAMIK; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
BIEN YAPI ÜRÜNLERI SANAYI TURIZM VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
K. Dere Çankaya, Ankara, TR
Other trademarks owned by BIEN YAPI ÜRÜNLERI SANAYI TURIZM VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | [ Watering machines for agricultural purposes, namely, non-mechanized livestock watering units ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Stone, artificial stone, marble, artificial marble; building materials, namely, sealer coatings sold as an integral component of natural and artificial stone for interior and exterior surfaces, residences and floor for construction purposes, facings not of metal for building, namely, ceramic tiles; floor tiles not of metal, pavement stones, border stones | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ Furniture made of all kinds of material; display stands and boards, index cabinets, medicine cabinets, writing and drawing desks, service carts, namely, tea carts, deck chairs, table counters not of metal, namely, sales and display counters, work benches, vice benches, furniture chests, non-metal mailboxes, fixed towel dispensers not of metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |