USPTO serial 79074784
CISITALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4924699Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2016
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CISITALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LU
L-2086 Luxemburg, LU
L-2086 Luxemburg, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq.
Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq. Munoz-Lopez & Associates PLLC305 BroadwaySuite 704New York, NY 10007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ publications, namely, books, magazines and catalogs in the fields of automotives, jewelry, watches and clocks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | leather and imitation leather, and goods made of these materials, namely, [ briefcases, ] key cases *;* [ , leather bags; ] suitcases, wallets, [ credit card cases and holders, leather pouches, ] purses, backpacks, [ bags for sports, ] haversacks, [ rucksacks, trunks and ] traveling bags; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | PUMI | PROOF OF USE INTERIM ACTION ISSUED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |