USPTO serial 79074793
INVENSITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3976543Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVENSITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultancy services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational and training services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, workshops and conferences in the field of business, business development, configuration management, exigence management, functional safety management, innovation management, process management, program and portfolio management, project controlling, project management, project planning, reliability analysis and engineering, requirement guided innovation, risk management, safety management, strategy and business process, supplier management, systems engineering, system safety management, technical excellence, technical project management, team management, test management and distribution of training material in connection therewith | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |