Drawing for BUILDING WELLNESS

USPTO serial 79074907

BUILDING WELLNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUILDING WELLNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for building purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
002Paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colorants; mordants; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artistsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019Building materials (non-metallic), floorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 6, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 4, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance