USPTO serial 79074927
SECUPANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3876414Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECUPANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sälzer Sicherheitstechnik GmbH
35037 Marburg, DE
Sälzer Sicherheitstechnik GmbH
35037 Marburg, DE
DE
Sälzer Sicherheitstechnik GmbH
35037 Marburg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Components for buildings and semi-finished products, namely, window frames, doors, door frames and ceiling panels made of pressed, rolled or cast metal, hard metal, light metal or alloys thereof as well as combinations of these materials; components for buildings and semi-finished products, namely, window frames, doors, door frames and ceiling panels made primarily of pressed, rolled or cast metal, hard metal, light metal or alloys thereof as well as combinations of these materials, and also containing wood; metal gratings: windows, doors, gates, facades, window frames, door frames and shutters for windows and doors made, for protection from fire, smoke, explosions, earthquakes, floodwater, BURGLARY, forced egress, made of pressed, rolled or cast metal, hard metal, light metal or alloys thereof as well as combinations of these materials; metal window fittings, metal door fittings, metal gate fittings, metal shutter fittings, metal locks; emergency push bars of metal or predominantly made of metal as components or accessories of windows, doors or gates for automatic relocking or re-interlocking after opening because of emergencies; metal handles and handles predominantly made of metal; metal emergency handles and metal anti-panic-fittings and emergency handles and anti-panic-fittings predominantly made of metal for windows, doors or gates for automatic relocking or re-interlocking after opening in case of emergencies; semi-finished METAL railings for fall protection; metal grills, METAL grill doors and METAL dividing walls FOR USE in buildings; METAL structural passageway blockades IN THE NATURE OF RETRACTABLE SECURITY GATES; METAL barriers and structural fender devices, namely, bollards | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Semi-finished products, namely, window frames, doors, door frames and ceiling panels made of pressed, rolled, cast or floated wood and plastics and glass; windows, doors, gates, facades, window frames, door frames and shutters for windows and doors made for protection from fire, smoke, explosions, earthquakes, floodwater, BURGLARY, forced egress, made of pressed, rolled, cast or floated wood and plastic and glass; wall boards and panels, structural passageway blockades IN THE NATURE OF RETRACTABLE SECURITY GATES, made of pressed, rolled, cast or floated wood and plastics and glass; fender devices, namely, WOODEN drop arms and CEMENT bollards | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Building construction planning, in the nature of technical development and technical planning of windows, doors, gates, grids, escape and anti-panic doors, grill gates and other dividing units, of through blockades, barriers, fender devices, facades, frames, WINDOW glazing, roller and folding shutters, watch houses, of electronic control, signal, inspection, monitoring and reporting devices for security and blocking installations and of magnetic contacts as well as of accessories and fittings for windows, doors, gates and facades for value for third parties; services of an engineer in the field of safety engineering, especially planning and accompanying consultancy concerning tenders, works contracts, execution, final inspection, certification of safety concepts and safety-related components and equipment; installation of software for electronic control, signal, inspection, monitoring and reporting devices for security and blocking installations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sälzer Sicherheitstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sälzer Sicherheitstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sälzer GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sälzer Sicherheitstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SECUPANIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |