USPTO serial 79075047
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dassault Systemes Deutschland GmbH
Stuttgart, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dassault Systemes Deutschland GmbH
CST - Computer Simulation Technology GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by CST - Computer Simulation Technology GmbH
CST -; Computer Simulation Technology AG
DE
Other trademarks owned by CST -; Computer Simulation Technology AG
CST -; Computer Simulation Technology AG
DE
Other trademarks owned by CST -; Computer Simulation Technology AG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luna M. Samman
Luna M. Samman Arent Fox LLP1717 K Street NWWashington, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the simulation of physical effects in three-dimensional structures for research and development institutions and laboratories as well as computer aided engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |