Drawing for DYNAGRIP

USPTO serial 79075051

DYNAGRIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3832180Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 10, 2010
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAGRIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Cronk

Peter J. Cronk Duane Morris LLP30 South 17th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic road, pavement, and floor materials, namely, concrete and cement aggregates in combination with natural resins, asphalt, pitch and bitumen, for making, surfacing and repairing roads, footpaths, playgrounds, tennis courts, floors and similar surfaces, namely, bridges, access ramps, port pontoons and ship decksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 11, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 17, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 7, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 7, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 20, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 10, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 16, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance