Drawing for DHM

USPTO serial 79075083

DHM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DHM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Services in connection with ongoing training, especially arranging of seminars live or online for professional training in the medical fieldSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Medical and scientific research in the fields of allergy and immunologySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Information and medical services in the fields of immunology and allergySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2020UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 28, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 30, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 22, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance