USPTO serial 79075542
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Willemstad; Curaçao, AN
Willemstad; Curaçao, AN
Willemstad Curaçao, AN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
MILENA S. MISHEV DEMONT & BREYER, LLC100 COMMONS WAYSTE 250HOLMDEL, NJ 07733-2935| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Agricultural biological products for the promotion of growth and blooming in plants and crops, namely, a liquid root growth stimulator, a growth stimulating preparation, and a blooming stimulating preparation; and fertilizers for agricultural, horticultural, forestry, domestic and commercial use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |