Drawing for INTERSEARCH

USPTO serial 79075575

INTERSEARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065181Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERSEARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

JULIE E. KRETZSCHMER HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing office functions in the field of intellectual and industrial property rights; providing databases containing information regarding intellectual and industrial property, namely, intellectual and industrial property rights available for possible acquisitionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
045Legal research and legal monitoring services in the field of intellectual property rights and industrial property rights, and intellectual property consultation; consultancy and legal services in the field of intellectual and industrial property rights; legal research regarding issues of the protection of industrial property and legal matters; legal services and consultancy concerning intellectual and industrial property rights; management of intellectual and industrial property rights, namely, intellectual property watch services, legal consultation and mediation in legal disputes; providing on-line interactive databases featuring legal information regarding intellectual and industrial propertySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 19, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 13, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 6, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 2, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance