Drawing for ZOOM

USPTO serial 79075603

ZOOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3991726Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 12, 2011
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Sunshine

David B. Sunshine Cozen O'Connor277 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10172UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for water supply and sanitary installations, namely, bathtubs, showers, wash-hand basins, bidets, toilets, taps, stop valves for taps; bath partitions, namely, shower and bathtub enclosures in the nature of partitions; bath installations, namely, bathtub jet apparatus for generating soap bubbles and foam; sauna bath installations; facial saunas, namely, electrical steam facial apparatus; bathtub surrounds in the nature of Turkish bath cabinets; whirlpool-jet apparatus; hot air electrical hand drying apparatus for lavatoriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020Bathroom furniture, namely, bathroom vanities, cabinets, shelves, showcases, mirrors, picture frames, coatstands, none of the foregoing to include chairs, seating for commercial use and wall bedsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Combs, cosmetic brushes, bath sponges, sponge holders, soap boxes, towel closets, toilet brushes, perfume and Eau de Cologne vaporisers sold empty, glass and porcelain jars for the bathroomSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 21, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 29, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 16, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 26, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 12, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2010LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2010LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Aug 3, 2010CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 2, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2010RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 31, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance