Drawing for DATAPOD

USPTO serial 79075616

DATAPOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4089453Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2012
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DATAPOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times Square21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-6524

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009modular, large scale data center enclosures for use in the storage of computer hardware in the fields of telecommunications and computer networkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 6, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 24, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 8, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 4, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 4, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 8, 2011RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 8, 2011RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2011RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 27, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 12, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance