Drawing for SENTARA

USPTO serial 79075619

SENTARA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3913212Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 1, 2011
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENTARA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RdLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; perfumes, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatories; make-up removing preparations; lipstick; beauty masks; shaving preparations; creams for leatherSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Dissemination of advertising material, namely, leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, samples; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; online advertising on a computer network; rental of advertising spaceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Beauty spa services for human beings or animals; beauty salons; hairdressing salonsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 8, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 10, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 8, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 8, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 31, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance