Drawing for FASHION INSTINCT

USPTO serial 79075651

FASHION INSTINCT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3818657Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2010
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASHION INSTINCT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN ST., 7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery, namely, perfumes and eaux de toilette; cosmetic beauty products, namely, blushes, eye shadows, make-up foundations, facial masks and beauty masks, lipsticks, nail varnish, nail-varnish removers; make-up removing lotions, creams and preparations; toiletry products, namely, hair shampoos, bath salts, bath and shower gels, foam baths, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions; soaps, shaving creams and foams; after-shave lotions and balms; dentifrices; sun-tanning products, namely, sun-tanning oils, milks, lotions and creams; self-tanning creams; non-medicated skin care preparations for the skin, body, face, eyes, lips, neck, bust, hands, legs and feet; anti-wrinkle creams; non-medicated energizing body lotions, toning lotions and creams; moisturizing creams and skin lotions, cosmetic body and face scrubs in cream form; toning lotions, creams, and gels for slimming; body deodorantsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 15, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 27, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 17, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 18, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance