Drawing for NEWFEEL

USPTO serial 79075662

NEWFEEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4004436Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 2, 2011
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWFEEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles T. J. Weigell

Charles T. J. Weigell FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail stores [ and online retail stores ] featuring footwear and sporting footwearSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041[ providing information and advice in the field of recreational walking; arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting running and walking events ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 9, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 18, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 18, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 23, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 16, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 10, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 201871.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 10, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 2, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance