Drawing for RAYNICE

USPTO serial 79075674

RAYNICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAYNICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal parts for fastening by means of clipping, gluing or assembling (fasteners, clips, bolts, screws, hooks, pegs) connected togetherSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Plastic parts for fastening by means of clipping, gluing or assembling (fasteners, clips, hooks, pegs) connected togetherSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 20, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 6, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 17, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance