USPTO serial 79075778
PYCNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841658Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PYCNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timur E. Slonim
TIMUR E. SLONIM MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND666 3RD AVEFL 24NEW YORK, NY 10017-4040Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit beverages, fruit-flavoured beverages, vegetable juices, non-alcoholic beers; fruit juices, plant juices, namely, aloe vera juice; non-alcoholic plant extract preparations, made with pine bark, for making beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HORPHAG RESEARCH MANAGEMENT SA
- Other trademarks owned by HORPHAG RESEARCH MANAGEMENT SA
- Other trademarks owned by HORPHAG RESEARCH MANAGEMENT SA
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PYCNO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |