USPTO serial 79075863
BEDLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEDLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Kennedy
PAUL J. KENNEDY PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH & ARCH STREETS3000 TWO LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Articles of clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, trousers, skirts, shirts, casual tops, cardigans, dresses, sports jerseys, sports pants, sports tops, shorts, base layers, running tights, underwear, socks, bathrobes, neck tubes, wraparound, arm warmers, children's clothing, namely, sleep suits, vests, rompers and one-piece garments, bibs not of paper, cloth bibs; footwear; headgear, namely, caps, baseball caps, beanies, hats and head wear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, paintball guns, paint balls being small balls filled with paint to be used with paintball guns, toy camouflage netting, action skill games, action target games, toy guns, toy weapons, toy armour; toy bows and arrows, toy balls | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Corporate entertainment services, namely, corporate entertainment services in the nature of arranging and conducting, and providing facilities to enable participation in, in relation to aerial sports, motor sports, water sports, archery, climbing and abseiling, falconry for recreational purposes, fishing, golf and golfing events, handling of explosives for recreational purposes, Highland games, pleasure flights and flying sessions for recreational purposes, shooting for recreational purposes, skiing, treasure hunts for recreational purposes, vehicular entertainment in the nature of car races and off road driving skills, and whisky tastings; arranging and provision of make-over and pampering parties; organising and staging of parties, galas, theme party nights and corporate events in the nature of corporate parties; arranging and conducting of educational conferences, conventions, exhibitions, meetings and seminars for others in the field of team building, management and leadership; casino, gambling and gaming services; booking and presentation of speakers and entertainers; organising and staging of war games and paintball games; information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |